Bug#756023: init: Please drop Essential:yes from init metapackage
Michael Biebl
biebl at debian.org
Fri Jul 25 15:54:54 BST 2014
Am 25.07.2014 16:48, schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
> In that case, apart from a new name and new source-package, why do we
> need two identical "metapackages"?
> This seems utterly redundant and more complicated then simply using
> sysvinit package for the transition. Ok, whatever.
Well, read the transition plan I referenced in my other reply.
The point is, that we want different behaviour depending on whether you
upgrade or do a fresh installation.
The sysvinit package in jessie won't be Essential: yes / Priority:
required anymore (upload for that is pending).
It will become an (optional) transitional package with the only purpose
being to ensure a smooth upgrade and providing a safety net.
Hope that clears things up.
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20140725/d06fdaa1/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers
mailing list