Bug#766233: VM won't start after an automatic upgrade to systemd inside the VM

[Tomas Pospisek]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Tomas Pospisek wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>> ain't there a 5th option, providing an lxc 1.0.x backport for
>> wheezy [corrected - tpo]? u at 451f.org has one prepared on mentors.d.n 
>> but I was reluctant to sponsor it (so far) as it was only 1.0.5-x, 
>> while 1.0.6-1 just had hit sid...
>> 
>> But a backport should fix this issue, possible in combination with a newer
>> kernel from backports.
>
> This seems like the best solution to me. Given that only a few months (how 
> many?) seem to be remaining until release - is it feasible in that time frame 
> to have 1.0.6-3 migrate from unstable to tesing and at the same time have it 
> either included in an lxc point release for wheezy or in wheezy-backports?
>
> What do you think about this solution Daniel?

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Daniel Baumann wrote:

> if someone wants to do the work for that, sure.

So, dear u at 451f.org - what do you think about that idea? Would it be a lot 
of work/feasible to backport 1.0.6-3 to wheezy? Would 1.0.6-3-wheezy have 
some other dependencies that'd need to be backported, such as some kernel 
feature as Holger proposed?

*t