Bug#782712: pre-upload unblock request: systemd/215-17 for RC bug #751707

[Niels Thykier]

On 2015-04-17 15:44, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Cyril Brulebois [2015-04-17 14:15 +0200]:
>> I tried to follow the code path in Ubuntu, which offers this option, to
>> track down where the offset can come from; and see whether Debian was
>> affected. I didn't mean to imply that Debian proposes the same option,
>> as it does not.
> 
> Ah ok, that explains the confusion. So let's fix ecryptfs in a
> post-release update, I'll file a bug with the references and
> explanations.
> 
>> systemd    | 215-16         | testing 
>> systemd    | 215-16         | unstable
> 
> -17 uploaded with the originally attached patch. The only difference
> is the s/UNRELEASED/unstable/ and the timestamp in the changelog.
> 
> Thanks, and sorry for the late timing again!
> 
> Martin
> 

Hi,

Just to clarify, are we still intending to do a systemd update prior to
Jessie with -17 and then now also a p-u (i.e. for 8.1) for ecryptfs?

If we are /not/ pulling systemd for Jessie release next release, we can
document the issue for the release notes (possibly as a "non-standard"
setup given d-i in Debian does not create this kind of disks, if I
understand the discussion correctly).

Thanks,
~Niels