Bug#804832: systemd-networkd fails to configure IPv4 Bridge Network

Ritesh Raj Sarraf rrs at researchut.com
Wed Nov 18 06:15:05 GMT 2015


Thanks Martin.

For the issue in itself, it now looks like something specific to
systemd.

I'll see if I can take it up with upstream devs.


Thanks,
Ritesh


On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:44 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf [2015-11-14 15:18 +0530]:
> > > > IPForward=yes
> > > 
> > > I believe this is the problem. Because we do not enable iptables
> > > support in networkd, then it cannot set this flag.
> 
> This should be unrelated. This is a sysctl, not iptables.
> 
> > I am not sure on how this works in systemd-networkd, but from the
> > manpage, it states that this switch is important. And that it is
> > important irrespective of the standard means through which we've
> > all
> > been enabling IP Forwarding in Linux so far.
> 
> Note that this has been changed/fixed in the upcoming 228. networkd
> now does not disable forwarding any more if/when IPForward= is not
> given, but merely enables it when it's explicitly set to "yes".
> Otherwise the kernel default now applies again, which means that
> tools
> which enable it globally will work again.
> 
> I brought this up a while ago on the ML:
> 
>   http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/20
> 15-October/008997.html
> 
> but I'm glad that we now don't have to do this any more as 228 will
> fix this more sensibly.
> 
> Martin
> 
-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20151118/837a5f7a/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list