Bug#804832: systemd-networkd fails to configure IPv4 Bridge Network
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
rrs at researchut.com
Wed Nov 18 06:15:05 GMT 2015
Thanks Martin.
For the issue in itself, it now looks like something specific to
systemd.
I'll see if I can take it up with upstream devs.
Thanks,
Ritesh
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:44 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf [2015-11-14 15:18 +0530]:
> > > > IPForward=yes
> > >
> > > I believe this is the problem. Because we do not enable iptables
> > > support in networkd, then it cannot set this flag.
>
> This should be unrelated. This is a sysctl, not iptables.
>
> > I am not sure on how this works in systemd-networkd, but from the
> > manpage, it states that this switch is important. And that it is
> > important irrespective of the standard means through which we've
> > all
> > been enabling IP Forwarding in Linux so far.
>
> Note that this has been changed/fixed in the upcoming 228. networkd
> now does not disable forwarding any more if/when IPForward= is not
> given, but merely enables it when it's explicitly set to "yes".
> Otherwise the kernel default now applies again, which means that
> tools
> which enable it globally will work again.
>
> I brought this up a while ago on the ML:
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/20
> 15-October/008997.html
>
> but I'm glad that we now don't have to do this any more as 228 will
> fix this more sensibly.
>
> Martin
>
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20151118/837a5f7a/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers
mailing list