Bug#812215: consider spliting systemd-tmpfiles into separate package

Michael Biebl biebl at debian.org
Sun Jan 31 00:55:02 GMT 2016


Am 23.01.2016 um 06:19 schrieb Josh Triplett:
> If having tmpfiles.d support across all architectures and init systems
> sounds appealing, I'd be willing to construct such a package, though I'd
> want to have co-maintainers who actually run sysvinit and/or non-Linux
> architectures.  The subset of tmpfiles.d syntax that can easily work on
> all POSIX systems seems simple enough to write.

I think we have consensus that tmpfiles suport for non-systemd systems
should be provided by an alternative implementation. So the question
would be, which package that implementation should be shipped in.

We already have an older bug for init-system-helpers [1]. Maybe that
would indeed be a good place to ship an alternative implementation.
Be it shell or perl based, or even C.

Michael



[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725959
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20160131/7528cdf5/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list