Bug#842617: Please also ship systemd-boot on arm64

Martin Pitt mpitt at debian.org
Mon Oct 31 05:46:13 GMT 2016


Alexander Kurtz [2016-10-30 22:05 +0100]:
> Thanks a lot for your quick reply! You might want to consider also
> adding "armhf" to that list, since both gnu-efi [0] and u-boot-rpi [1]
> are also available there (in contrast to "armel" where gnu-efi is
> missing).

I know that arm64 EFI boot works (Canonical uses it in their internal
OpenStack deployment), but as far as I know there is no existing
armhf EFI implementation; so this would mean to ship dead bits. Or are
you aware of any platform where this could actually be tested?

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20161031/04a413e5/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list