Bug#838480: summary of disagreement

[Dmitry Bogatov]

I drafted following text, expressing my vision of problem. You may wish
to extend it with your vision.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear Technical Comitete,

  currently, inclusion of new init system into Debian requires inclusion into
pre-dependency of bin:init package, which is unsatisfactory.

As can be followed in #838480, current practice puts maintainer of any
new init system to be included into Debian at disadvantage, essentially
granting maintainer of bin:init (which happens to be `systemd' team now)
veto right. According to Constitution 3.1, individual developer poses
power of descision making only with regard their /own/ work.

Hereby, I ask TCCE to provide requirements init system must satisfy that
/warrants/ inclusion into pre-dependency of essential bin:init.
Alternatively, I ask to consider introducion of virtual package
'init-system'.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KYX7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----