Bug#887904: RFR: Make dh_installinit and dh_installsystemd debhelper autoscript snippets independent in c12 (Was: Re: Bug#887904: dh_installsystemd will unmask services *after* an attempt to start them)
Niels Thykier
niels at thykier.net
Wed May 16 13:32:00 BST 2018
Felipe Sateler:
> [...]
>
> I think the entanglement can be removed by runtime checking of the unit.
>
> 1. Swap the order of installinit and installsystemd so systemd acts first.
(Moved related argument up)
> Step one is needed in case the compatibility symlink is created at
> systemd-enable time (via Alias)
>
Just to confirm, we just need "d-s-h enable <service>" from
dh_installsystemd to run before the snippet below for the same service,
correct?
If so, then we have an alternative method for handling that besides
re-ordering the helpers. That would have the advantage of also working
if people call dh_installinit and dh_installsystemd in a different order
than we expect.
> 2. Have the installinit snippet do:
>
> if [ -d /run/systemd/system ] && [ "/etc/init.d/#SCRIPT" != "$(systemctl
> show --value --property SourcePath #SCRIPT#.service)" ] ; then
> # do nothing
> else
> invoke-rc.d #SCRIPT# start || #ERROR_HANDLER#
> fi
>
> This checking could also be moved into invoke-rc.d via some flag. What do
> you think?
>
I think it would be best if that logic was handled by invoke-rc.d. In
case that logic need to be updated for some reason, then it is a lot
easier to just update update-rc.d than thousands of maintscripts.
Can you handle the update-rc.d side or should I file a bug against
init-system-helpers?
Thanks,
~Niels
More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers
mailing list