Bug#842617: Please also ship systemd-boot on arm64

[Michael Biebl]

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:46:13 +0200 Martin Pitt <mpitt at debian.org> wrote:
> Alexander Kurtz [2016-10-30 22:05 +0100]:
> > Thanks a lot for your quick reply! You might want to consider also
> > adding "armhf" to that list, since both gnu-efi [0] and u-boot-rpi [1]
> > are also available there (in contrast to "armel" where gnu-efi is
> > missing).
> 
> I know that arm64 EFI boot works (Canonical uses it in their internal
> OpenStack deployment), but as far as I know there is no existing
> armhf EFI implementation; so this would mean to ship dead bits. Or are
> you aware of any platform where this could actually be tested?

Martin, do you still have concerns regarding enabling gnu-efi support
for armhf?
Personally I don't have any experience in that regard, all I can say is
that we apparently ship
https://packages.debian.org/sid/armhf/grub-efi-arm
(with a popcon count of 0 :-o )

Regards,
Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20181117/cb7c131c/attachment-0002.sig>