Bug#826214: Please would 40-systemd honour __init_d_script_name

[Benda Xu]

Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

> I think reimplementing init-d-script in C is the wrong solution to
> this bug.  Certainly, if the only thing it is buying is us an ability
> to manipulate $0.  I infer from Dmitry's closing of #913247 which
> requests init-d-script in C, that he also doesn't like that idea.
>
> So I think both Dmitry and I are in agreement that the right solution
> here is the first of Dmitry's two bullet points above.  Ie, the
> sysvinit maintainers are of the opinion that this should be fixed by
> amending 40-systemd, which is part of the systemd package.
>
> I'm therefore reassigning this bug.  Benda, if you disagree; or,
> Dmitry, if I have misunderstood your view: please do say.

I agree with Ian and Dmitry, and have no objections to this decision.

Thank you to all the parties coming together to fix this.

Yours,
Benda