Bug#556893: #556893,say which 'defaults' are which better

[Michael Biebl]

Control: tags -1 - patch

Am 13.10.19 um 21:41 schrieb Jesse Smith:
> On 10/13/19 4:33 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

>> Will insserv fail if the version is too old, i.e. do we need a versioned
>> dependency (or rather versioned Breaks)?
> 
> Yes, older versions of insserv will fail if --silent is specified as it
> will not be a recognized option. There should probably be a version
> check. Or a check in the calling script to try with insserv --silent and
> if it fails, try again without the flag.

Ok, thanks.

Removing the patch tag then.

>> What exactly is suppressed by -q/--silent?
>> Only this specific error about "defaults" or other error messages as
>> well? Do we want to suppress all error messages?
> 
> The --silent flag suppresses warnings (non-fatal errors). Basically
> anything that is a "heads up" warning is suppressed. Fatal errors and
> issues which require user attention are still printed.

Ok, good.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20191013/4075059d/attachment.sig>