Bug#944478: fixed in debhelper 12.8

[Michael Biebl]

Am 01.02.20 um 20:43 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> What's your thought here? Should we transition to the name
> debian/foo.tmpfiles in compat 13? It would probably be good to keep
> support for debian/foo.tmpfile in compat 13 but logging a warning and
> making the existentence of a debian/foo.tmpfile a hard error in compat 14?
> 
> Or do you think the name is purely cosmetical and changing it now is
> just creating busy work?

If we decide to change the name, now would probably be a good time
before compat 13 is officially released. I assume it's still ok to
change the behaviour of compat 13 or is this already too late?

Regards,
Michael

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20200201/61c851fe/attachment.sig>