Bug#996202: systemd - EFI Secure Boot for systemd-boot

[Michael Biebl]

Am 18.11.21 um 16:58 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 04:26:47PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.11.21 um 15:21 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
>>> we have recently discussed the matter of systemd-boot in
>>> an upstream shim review gathering.
>>
>> Is this discussion public? Can you share it?
> 
> We unfortunately do not have a written record of it.

private cabal, eh :-)

>>> * systemd-boot does not use current ways of communicating with
>>>     shim
>>>
>>> * There was some concern over general quality
>>
>> Has this been passed along to the systemd maintainers?
>> If so, what's their take on this? If not, could you forward your
>> findings/concerns to upstream, please?
> 
> It's not really my place, that's a discussion for other people
> to have, and I don't have all the details.

Well, who if not you? I mean you said you are (part of) shim upstream?
If you reject it, it would be good to actually have a bit more details 
then just meh, not going to happen.

That doesn't feel right.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20211118/6dc70a73/attachment.sig>