Bug#983357: Bug#988776: Bug#983357: Netinst crashes xen domU when loading kernel

Chuck Zmudzinski brchuckz at netscape.net
Tue Sep 21 16:13:53 BST 2021


On 8/24/2021 7:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 03:27:19PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> writes:
>>
>>> I think a proper fix would be one of:
>>>
>>> a. If the Xen virtual keyboard driver is advertising capabilities it
>>>     doesn't have, stop it doing that.
>>> b. Change the implementation of modalias attributes to allow longer
>>>     values.
>>>
>>> It's not clear to me whether the Xen driver is advertising correctly or
>>> not.  If it is, then�the solution should be b, but that may be too
>>> disruptive a change to the kernel.  So a reasonable workaround might
>>> be:
>>>
>>> c. Change the input subsystem to limit the length of the
>>>     capabilities part of the modalias.
>> The problem with a) is that the Xen keyboard is not a physical keyboard
>> and so it has no way of knowing what keys it actually has.  It is a fake
>> input device designed to pass through whatever input the Xen hypervisor
>> sends down.  As such, any key could come in.  If it doesn't advertise
>> that it has all of these keys, then they would not be accepted by
>> libinput when the hypervisor sends them down.
> Right, that's what I feared.
>
> xen-kbdfront is setting the bits for keys in the ranges [KEY_ESC,
> KEY_UNKNOWN) and [KEY_OK, KEY_MAX), which I think works out to 654
> keys and 2362 bytes in the modalias.
>
>> This seems to be the heart of the problem: libinput was designed
>> assuming that all keyboards can and must report what keys are actually
>> present, and then libinput tries to cram that information into the
>> modalias rather than some other sysfs attribute as it should ( or not at
>> all... I still don't see how this information is actually supposed to be
>> useful to userspace ).
> I think modaliases aren't intended to be interpreted by user-space,
> other than processing wildcards when matching to modules.
>
> For input devices, the same information is available through other
> variables in the uevent, in a more compact form.  The information *is*
> useful for user-space; e.g. in initramfs-tools we recognise keyboard
> devices and add their drivers to the initramfs but ignore other input
> devices.
>
>> As for b), the problem isn't with the modalias attribute itself, but
>> when the kernel tries to copy it into the environment block for the udev
>> callout.  The environment block is only a single page, and so limited to
>> 4 KB.  And that's for everything else that goes into the environment,
>> not just the modalias.
> Text-based sysfs attributes are limited to a page, but udev receives
> uevents through netlink, not sysfs.
>
> The current limit on the environment of a uevent appears to be 2 KB
> (UEVENT_BUFFER_SIZE defined in <linux/kobject.h>).  That seems like it
> *might* be easier to change, so long as user-space doesn't have a
> similar limit.
>
> I looked into systemd/udev, and it seems to use an 8 KB buffer for
> receiving uevents:
>
> https://sources.debian.org/src/systemd/247.9-1/src/libsystemd/sd-device/device-monitor.c/?hl=390#L390
>
> But as a first step I think increasing the kernel buffer size to 4 KB
> would be enough.  Perhaps someone could test whether this patch to the
> domU kernel makes udev happier:
>
> --- a/include/linux/kobject.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kobject.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
>   
>   #define UEVENT_HELPER_PATH_LEN		256
>   #define UEVENT_NUM_ENVP			64	/* number of env pointers */
> -#define UEVENT_BUFFER_SIZE		2048	/* buffer for the variables */
> +#define UEVENT_BUFFER_SIZE		4096	/* buffer for the variables */
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER
>   /* path to the userspace helper executed on an event */
> --- END ---
>
> ?
>
> Ben.
>

Even though this patch has been tested to apparently fix this bug and
the bug has been elevated to important and tagged patch and upstream,
AFAICT there is no action yet upstream or anywhere else after more than
three weeks. Is this patch dead as a possible fix for this bug?

Best wishes,

Chuck



More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list