Bug#556893: say which 'defaults' are which better

Michael Biebl biebl at debian.org
Mon May 23 21:23:26 BST 2022


On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:59:14 +0800 jidanni at jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: sysv-rc
> Version: 2.87dsf-8
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Say, perhaps these messages should differentiate better the two origins
> of the definition of 'defaults':
> 
> # update-rc.d  network-manager defaults
> update-rc.d: using dependency based boot sequencing
> insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty) of script `network-manager' overwrites defaults (2 3 4 5).
> insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 2 3 4 5 6) of script `network-manager' overwrites defaults (0 1 6).
> 
> Or else the user will think "but I did say defaults".

Let's close this.

init-system-helpers no longer by default uses insserv.
And if insserv is used, I don't think we should supress any warning 
messages.
And if there are warning messages by insserv that should not be shown or 
improved, it's something that needs to be addressed in insserv.

Regards,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20220523/3bda6189/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list