Bug#945269: debian-policy: packages should use tmpfiles.d(5) to create directories below /var

[Sean Whitton]

Hello,

On Tue 13 Jun 2023 at 05:58PM +01, Mark Hindley wrote:

> There is a new upstream version of elogind[1] that is already packaged in
> Devuan[2] although that uncovered up an upstream issue that I am waiting to be
> resolved[3]. So, maybe by the end of this month?
>
> However, that is only considering whether the packaging and dependencies can be
> made to work (like Simon McVittie, I think they probably can).
>
> I remain much less convinced that there is a consensus for requiring packages to
> use tmpfiles.d(5) for /var, /tmp and maybe /etc. The recent thread on
> debian-devel demonstrated a range of opinion. Thorsten and Bill have just raised
> valid points about chroots.
>
> So, whilst I am happy to test the dependency changes in elogind, enshrining this
> as a 'should' in the Policy now seems, at least, premature.

Cool, thank you.  This will simplify resolving this bug.

> Reading the proposed text as somebody who is particularly interested
> in non-systemd systems, I am struck by the inconsistency between
>
>   Init systems other than ``systemd`` should allow providing the same
>   functionality as appropriate for each system, for example managing the
>   directories from the init script shipped by the package.
>
> and the fact that we no longer expect packages to include init scripts alongside
> their systemd units and even accept their removal, even if other interested
> people offer to maintain them and provide tested patches.

I'm sympathetic, though, this in itself is not a Policy issue.

-- 
Sean Whitton
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 869 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20230616/c8e1a112/attachment-0001.sig>