Bug#996202: EFI Secure Boot for systemd-boot

[Pascal Hambourg]

On 05/03/2024 at 00:58, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 23:28, Steve McIntyre <steve at einval.com> wrote:
>>
>> What's your plan for installing as the secondary boot loader for shim
>> to call?
> 
> 'bootctl update' already recognises and prefers foo.efi.signed if
> present, so installing to the ESP is easy (PR still doesn't add the
> call, will probably add a trigger).
> 
> But as you know Shim right now compiles in the filename of the second
> stage, so for now interested testers will have to manually rename the
> file in the ESP from systemd-bootx64.efi to grubx64.efi, which is of
> course not ideal - let's call it a technological preview.

What about the installation of shim files into the ESP along with 
systemd-boot ? Does bootctl take care of it ? If no, are there any plans 
to integrate it ?

Also, are there any plans to support multiple ESPs for boot redundancy 
(e.g. in software RAID setups) ?