Bug#1050256: AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets

Salvatore Bonaccorso carnil at debian.org
Fri Nov 29 21:12:52 GMT 2024


Hi John,

On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 09:35:25PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > For those watching this bug: John has prepared backports in his tree,
> > with both approaches:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor.git/log/?h=debian-two-patch-1780227
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor.git/log/?h=debian-backport-1780227
> > 
> > (but with the open question which one will be submitted for stable.
> > >From upstream stable point of view probably the two patch backport
> > approach would be the preferred one).
> 
> We still have tis issue open for 6.1.y upstream TTBOMK. If you are
> confident as maintainer with any of the two approaches, would it be
> possible to submit them for stable? If the preferred one get then
> accepted and queued, we might already cherry-pick the solution for us,
> but at this point we can wait for the respective 6.1.y stable version
> which will include the fix.

Friendly ping. Any news here?

Regards,
Salvatore



More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list