[Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Re: Please test new sysvinit, sysv-rc,
initscripts
Thomas Hood
jdthood at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Dec 18 11:53:09 UTC 2005
Roger Leigh wrote:
> $ lintian -i sysvinit_2.86.ds1-7_powerpc.changes
> E: sysvinit: symlink-should-be-absolute bin/pidof ../sbin/killall5
Thanks. I have just opened a bug for this so I don't forget to fix it.
> W: sysvinit: binary-has-unneeded-section ./usr/bin/last .comment
I have been meaning to ask Miquel about this. We didn't change the way
these files were generated, so this bug must (?) have been there before
Petter and I got involved.
> E: initscripts: non-standard-toplevel-dir run/
> N:
> N: The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard forbids the installation of new
> N: files or directories in the root directory, in section 3.
The statement about the FHS is not true. I'll override this.
> E: initscripts: postrm-does-not-call-updaterc.d-for-init.d-script /etc/init.d/"$@"
Bogus, since the postinst uses its own updaterc function. Lintian should be fixed.
> W: initscripts: init.d-script-not-marked-as-conffile /etc/init.d/"$@"
> E: initscripts: init.d-script-not-included-in-package /etc/init.d/"$@"
Also bogus. Lintian should be fixed. I've just filed the report.
> There are also some signedness warnings during the build. These are
> usually fairly simple to fix up. I've attached the build log.
These should be fixed upstream. I have written him (Miquel) but haven't
received a reply.
Thanks a lot for the help!
--
Thomas Hood
More information about the Pkg-sysvinit-devel
mailing list