[Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Why do we fall back to trying /sbin/portmap?
Thomas Hood
jdthood at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jan 12 08:56:28 UTC 2006
I wrote to pkg-sysvinit-devel:
> The current portmap package installs its own initscript at S:S43 so (sarge backport
> concerns aside) we could eliminate both calls to portmap and add a dependency on
> the current version of the portmap package.
Interestingly, mountnfs.sh decides whether or not to start portmap based on what it
finds in /etc/fstab. /etc/rcS.d/S43portmap does not read fstab but seems to start
portmap unconditionally.
portmap maintainers: Would it be OK to remove the call to /etc/init.d/portmap from
/etc/rcS.d/S45mountnfs.sh if we depend on the current version of the portmap
package?
--
Thomas Hood
More information about the Pkg-sysvinit-devel
mailing list