[Pkg-sysvinit-devel] procps with pidof is released

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:47:07PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:10:52AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > upstream what they are going to do?  If they are going to keep pidof
> > then the change is not required.  If the projects plans is to
> Which I did.

> For the moment they have no plans moving pidof though they don't seem
> terribly fussed either way (that's my read of it anyhow).

> What I have done is used the --disable-pidof flag in procps configure
> step. This means procps does *not* have pidof and it can remain in
> sysvinit-tools for the time being.

> If the upstream decides to move it, we'll work out what to do then.

Good to hear.  Thanks for your diligence in following this up, Craig!

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/attachments/20131216/ada33c46/attachment.sig>