On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:11:34PM +0200, Stefan Sobernig wrote: Hi, > >As far as I can see we're only dealing with the FTBFS. > > This is fine with me, I had the misconception that an FTBFS warrants a > "high". But I was clearly wrong, the package is not even in testing. Ok uploaded. Thanks Stefan. Sven