[Pkg-telepathy-maintainers] Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

Simon McVittie smcv at debian.org
Fri Jun 7 08:38:02 UTC 2013


On 06/06/13 22:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 11:10
+0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Cc pkg-telepathy-maintainers: could someone who uses telepathy-idle
>> regularly please pick this up?

Apparently the answer to that is "no". :-(

>> Sorry, I've been holding off on this because the proposed patch is a
>> regression: users who were relying on the ability to get a
>> (man-in-the-middle-vulnerable) connection to a SSL IRC server whose
>> certificate is self-signed or untrusted can no longer do so. I didn't
>> think many people would fall into this category, but apparently quite a
>> lot do...

Does the RT have any opinion on which of the possible resolutions would
be acceptable/preferred for stable?

* upload 0.1.11-2+deb7u1 as-is, and accept the regression
  (Ubuntu did this; Sjoerd considers this unacceptable, AIUI)

* add an "ignore SSL errors" option that reverts to the old
  insecure behaviour (a small amount of new code, I would guess
  ~10 lines)

* upload 0.1.16 to wheezy (~1k lines of necessary code for
  interactive certificate prompting, ~1k lines of unrelated
  bugfixes and an unrelated new feature, but has actually
  been tested in this form)

* upload 0.1.16 to wheezy-backports (which should be trivial),
  and upload 0.1.11-2+deb7u1 with a NEWS file noting the regression
  and suggesting the backport

* backport the certificate bits from 0.1.16 to 0.1.11
  (~ 1k lines of necessary code, mostly adapted from
  code in telepathy-gabble that is already in stable)

    S




More information about the Pkg-telepathy-maintainers mailing list