[Pkg-tigervnc-devel] TigerVNC debian upload

[Joachim Falk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 22.03.2013 23:29, schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
> 
> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>>> yes! and I expected sid  to be close enough to wheezy at this
>>> point... I did build for sid but haven't tested it -- I will
>>> try to build for wheezy explicitly now and see how that one
>>> works.  If there is a divergence -- we indeed would need to
>>> address it.
> 
>> built fine for both wheezy and sid... As for the final upload --
>> shouldn't we update X to 1.12.4 in tigervnc?
We should. I have update xorg-server to xorg-server (2:1.12.4-5). I am
testing now.

> so -- what should be our consensus on this and the .orig.tar.gz
> (just empty one? and then we should upload
> 
> NB even if we push in turbojpeg, it would take it a while to get
> through NEW, so we better not depend on it atm.
> 

- -- 
Joachim Falk <Joachim.Falk at gmx.de>

You can always tell a really good idea by the enemies it makes.
  --programmers' axiom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=S8kQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----