[Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#843543: Bug#843543: tigervnc: FTBFS with xserver 1.19

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort pochu at debian.org
Tue Nov 22 22:57:18 UTC 2016


Control: severity -1 serious

On 08/11/16 22:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/11/16 17:40, Ben Hildred wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu at debian.org 
>> <mailto:pochu at debian.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Source: tigervnc
>>     Version: 1.6.0+dfsg-4
>>     Severity: important
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I rebuilt your package against xserver 1.19 (2:1.18.99.901-1 to be precise,
>>     note we have 2:1.18.99.902-1 in experimental now) and it failed to build,
>>     particularly it failed to apply the patches to the new xserver:
>>
>>     Hunk #1 succeeded at 161 with fuzz 2 (offset 36 lines).
>>     Hunk #2 FAILED at 153.
>>     Hunk #3 FAILED at 215.
>>     Hunk #4 FAILED at 226.
>>     3 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file os/WaitFor.c.rej
>>     debian/rules:126: recipe for target
>>     'unix/xserver/.apply-patches-vnc-patch-xorg.stamp' failed
>>
>>     (full log attached)
>>
>>     I see there is a new upstream release, so it may be good to look at that
>>     for xserver 1.19 compatibility.
>>
>> I have seen a fix for this in the upstream change history. I cannot remember if 
>>   it made it into 1.7 or not from the top of my head.
> 
> I saw some patches in upstream github too[1]. IIRC they were not in the last
> release, but they can probably be backported?
> 
> [1]
> https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/commit/3fed95eda27dfbeee6535f987f5d14a66f64749b

I just uploaded xserver 1.19 to sid, so this is RC.

Cheers,
Emilio



More information about the Pkg-tigervnc-devel mailing list