[Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#843543: Bug#843543: tigervnc: FTBFS with xserver 1.19
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
pochu at debian.org
Tue Nov 22 22:57:18 UTC 2016
Control: severity -1 serious
On 08/11/16 22:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/11/16 17:40, Ben Hildred wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu at debian.org
>> <mailto:pochu at debian.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Source: tigervnc
>> Version: 1.6.0+dfsg-4
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I rebuilt your package against xserver 1.19 (2:1.18.99.901-1 to be precise,
>> note we have 2:1.18.99.902-1 in experimental now) and it failed to build,
>> particularly it failed to apply the patches to the new xserver:
>>
>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 161 with fuzz 2 (offset 36 lines).
>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 153.
>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 215.
>> Hunk #4 FAILED at 226.
>> 3 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file os/WaitFor.c.rej
>> debian/rules:126: recipe for target
>> 'unix/xserver/.apply-patches-vnc-patch-xorg.stamp' failed
>>
>> (full log attached)
>>
>> I see there is a new upstream release, so it may be good to look at that
>> for xserver 1.19 compatibility.
>>
>> I have seen a fix for this in the upstream change history. I cannot remember if
>> it made it into 1.7 or not from the top of my head.
>
> I saw some patches in upstream github too[1]. IIRC they were not in the last
> release, but they can probably be backported?
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/commit/3fed95eda27dfbeee6535f987f5d14a66f64749b
I just uploaded xserver 1.19 to sid, so this is RC.
Cheers,
Emilio
More information about the Pkg-tigervnc-devel
mailing list