[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#742971: Bug#742971: Not NM managed interfaces

[Leonardo]

Hi,

I use this configuration because I like NM to manage my eth0 but I want to
be able to attach qemu vm to bridge, so br0 starts witn no ports and this
can make a difference.

Now I see NM can manage bridges so I wish to do tests.

In short, this is extracted from my /etc/network/interfaces.

# Bridge setup
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
        address 10.10.25.1
        netmask 255.255.255.0
        broadcast 10.10.25.255
        hwaddress ether 62:aa:af:24:cf:8f
        #bridge_ports mac0
        bridge_ports none    # if you do not want to bind to any ports
        bridge_stp off       # disable Spanning Tree Protocol
        bridge_waitport 0    # no delay before a port becomes available
        bridge_fd 0          # no forwarding delay
        bridge_ports regex eth* # use a regular expression to define ports
        up sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.br0.proxy_arp=1

Bye



2014-03-31 16:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl <biebl at debian.org>:

> Am 31.03.2014 16:45, schrieb Leonardo:
> > In my system I configured a bridge in /etc/network/interfaces so br0
> > inteface is listed in /run/network/ifstate.
> >
> > After removing the row br0=br0 from /run/network/ifstate I can start NM
> > without segmentation fault.
> >
> > I suppose unmanaged interfaces conflicts with WM.
>
> I did test with an unmanaged interface wlan0 in /e/n/i and couldn't
> reproduce the bug. I will try to see if the existence of a bridge config
> makes a difference. Thanks for the hint.
>
>
> --
> Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
> universe are pointed away from Earth?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-utopia-maintainers/attachments/20140331/b872a6f7/attachment-0001.html>