[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#910068: firewalld: rich rules don't allow destination masks

Pavel Kreuzt pkreuzt at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 10:45:23 BST 2018


Package: firewalld
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

issuing a rish rule that includes a mask sush as

# firewall-cmd --add-rich-rule='rule family="ipv4" destination address="239.0.0.0/8" accept'

results in an error:

ERROR: Failed to apply rules. A firewall reload might solve the issue if the firewall has been modified using ip*tables or ebtables.
ERROR: '/usr/sbin/nft add rule inet firewalld filter_IN_public_allow meta nfproto ipv4 ip6 daddr 239.0.0.0/8 accept' failed: Error: conflicting protocols specified: ip vs. ip6#012add rule inet firewalld filter_IN_public_allow meta nfproto ipv4 ip6 daddr 239.0.0.0/8 accept#012

This is already patched in Firewalld Github' master branch.

Versions of packages firewalld depends on:
ii  dbus               1.12.10-1
ii  gir1.2-glib-2.0    1.58.0-1
ii  iptables           1.6.2-1.1
ii  nftables           0.9.0-1
ii  policykit-1        0.105-21
ii  python3            3.6.6-1
ii  python3-dbus       1.2.8-2+b1
ii  python3-gi         3.30.1-1
ii  python3-slip-dbus  0.6.5-2

Versions of packages firewalld recommends:
ii  ebtables  2.0.10.4-5
ii  ipset     6.34-1

firewalld suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/firewalld/firewalld.conf [Errno 13] Permiso denegado: '/etc/firewalld/firewalld.conf'
/etc/firewalld/lockdown-whitelist.xml [Errno 13] Permiso denegado: '/etc/firewalld/lockdown-whitelist.xml'

-- no debconf information



More information about the Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list