[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#985556: flatpak/1.2.5-0+deb10u4 FTBFS on i386

[Philipp Kern]

On 20.03.21 13:32, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 09:16:45 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:12:39AM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> Could x86-conova-01.debian.org be an IPv6-only buildd?
> ...
>>> Or, if not that, could it be the case that this buildd is firewalled or
>>> otherwise restricted such that connections from the build to a test
>>> server listening on an arbitrary high port number on the loopback
>>> interface will fail?
>>
>> JFTR, this might indeed be the case. I gave it back a couple of times
>> and building on x86-conova-01.debian.org failed. The last one got
>> picked on buildd-x86-grnet-01 which now seems to have built.
> 
> If we now have buildds that are more restrictive or limited than
> the buildds that were used at the time stable was frozen, then
> it would probably be good if it was possible to arrange for only
> testing/unstable/experimental packages to be built on those buildds,
> with stable updates built on buildds that more closely resemble the ones
> they were originally tested on - otherwise we'll get random build
> regressions.

The buildd is IPv6-only. I'm somewhat torn given that we have enough
buildd coverage that a give-back would likely solve the problem. At the
same time you can't avoid a particular buildd either. So I concur, as
much as it hurts me in this day and age, that we should at least
temporarily disable stable/oldstable builds on the IPv6-only buildds.

I have commented out stretch and buster (and their corresponding
security and backports suites) on x86-conova-01 for now. I'll definitely
leave bullseye on, though. Not sure if there's another IPv6-only buildd
lingering around.

Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern