[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#1041552: HFS/HFS+ are insecure

Marco d'Itri md at linux.it
Sun Aug 27 11:39:11 BST 2023


On Aug 27, Diederik de Haas <didi.debian at cknow.org> wrote:

> While I agree that "orphan" does mean that it is NOT actively maintained, 
> AFAICT the situation is a bit more blurry for "odd fixes".
All these file systems are either rare enough and/or not used on 
removable media, so I do not believe that it is unreasonable to ask the
few users that want them to be mounted automatically to disable this 
policy with a symlink like
ln -s /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/75-insecure-fs.rules .

> Previously not knowing about that status, I looked up the commits where the 
> status was set to "odd fixes" and found that for some the reason was that the 
> maintainer didn't have the hardware to test it themselves.
> I do not think that's the same as 'unmaintained'.
It means that they are not tested enough...

> I'm not sure if it would actually result in unbootable systems, but I do think
> a bit more care should be taken before blacklisting modules.
Did you actually read the thread? No modules are being blacklisted, the 
plan is just to stop udisks2 from automatically mounting such removable 
media.
I am quite sure that routers file systems are not mounted with udisks2.

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-utopia-maintainers/attachments/20230827/14b85b8c/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-utopia-maintainers mailing list