vdr-patches

Thomas Schmidt pkg-vdr-dvb-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:38:43 +0200


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Christoph Martin schrieb am 09.08.04, um 14:15 Uhr:
> > I think we have now a really big problem to get the new vdr-packages
> > into sarge, because the alpha-autobilder still did not build vdr
> > 1.2.6-4, and it is now nr. 439 in the needs-build-queue on alpha.
>=20
> Where did you get the information about the position in the queue from?

The information is from:
http://www.buildd.net/buildd/alpha_needs-build.txt

The problem with the queue-odering is that it absolutely does not
respect the time of the upload, the queues are just sorted by priority
of the packages (vdr is unfortunately Priority: extra, which is the
lowest), then alphabetically by Section, and then by package-name.
(The last-build-state on the arch has also some influence on this.)

So with the current high upload-rate and the queue-algorithm above,
nearly all packages with Priority: extra will not be built in a
reasonable time, at least on the archs with the overloaded buildds.
(alpha, arm, mips, mipsel, m68k)

> I could do a build on a alpha machine, but I only have access to the
> buildd machine (escher) where it is deprecated to build packages:

Ah, ok, this really would not help very much, as escher seems to be
totally overloaded anyway.

> I would recommend the later version, because -5 is the better
> version(?). Because there are a lot of other packages still to be build,
> I think the problem with the alpha queue will be resolved anyway.

Yes, i prefer this solution too: -5 closes 4 bugs (3 important), and=20
adds some really useful featues (patchlevel-handling...). The problem=20
with this option is that vdr then becomes out-of-date on all archs,=20
and with the current situation with the buildds it will take very=20
long to build it.
See: http://www.buildd.net/buildd/Needs-Build_stats.png

@Tobias:
What do you think, is vdr 1.2.6-5 ready, or do you want to add
additional patches?


Thomas

--=20
Thomas Schmidt
thomas.schmidt@in.stud.tu-ilmenau.de

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBF3BTc9+NqwoydlIRAkvYAJ9fRgv2SLvtR5f8AtUh4FE+rJxBigCdGvMP
hTcR6vUddTOdFMOlfmydxM4=
=U6aV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--