Bug#1100450: dvgrab: No watch file provided, not clear where the source was obtained from

[Christoph Martin]

Hi Andreas

Am 14.03.25 um 17:10 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> 
> Yes, I know.  But the information in d/copyright is wrong and this is a bug.

Right

>> And https://www.kinodv.org/ says kino is dead as of 5.8.2013. I don't know
>> if this is also true of dvgrab. At least we have relative high popcon level.
>> And yes, the github repo you mentioned looks like code for dvgrab, salvaged
>> from sourceforge. But it has no releases, so a watch file would not return
>> any useful information.
> 
> That's definitely not true since in gitmode watch files can return the
> latest commit.  And somehow the version looks pretty much like the
> latest commit from "somewhere" (!= the Github repository),  If I would
> have been sure I would have sent a patch but its simply not clear from
> what Git repository source was obtained from.

The version in Debian is git20160707.1.e46042e-1 which references git 
commit e46042e. It looks for me that it is the commit from 
https://github.com/ddennedy/dvgrab/commit/e46042e0c7b3523b6854ee547b0534e8310b7460
which is from May 16, 2016

>> Anyway it would be a good idea to have the package source in salsa.
> 
> Thus my bug report.  I wonder whether you consider the VDR team a sensible
> team or whether it might be rather multimedia-team.

If the multimedia-team is more active than the vdr-team it can well go 
there. I the last time I took the task to bring the vdr and dvb packages 
up to date, because nobody else did.

Cheers
Christoph