Bug#379839: vim: Bogus color schema

[Jens Seidel]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:53:23PM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> tag 379839 wontfix
> thanks

It's OK for me to ignore the insufficient contrast introduced by more
supported color modes but please note that this bug report was initially
about a wrong color scheme.
 
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:35:47PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:03:24AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:40:59PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:50:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > > > Hi, I noticed that the default color schema of vimdiff is wrong, since
> > > > > added lines in one of the files are not visible because foreground and
> > > > > background color are identical.

This isn't a "won't fix"!

> > The contrast is nevertheless bad. Bright blue on blue or pink on red are
> > not optimal. The older settings where better.
> 
> I agree that the contrast is bad, but there's only so much you can do
> with the limited color set available in a terminal.  More syntax
> 
> I'm tagging this as wontfix since there's not much to do about it even
> though I agree that it can be problematic.

It applies not to the initial problem.
If you have a patch and want to see this in Etch I could provide a
German translation update if necessary to bypass the freeze :-)

Jens