vim plugin

James McCoy jamessan at debian.org
Wed Dec 21 19:19:32 UTC 2011


On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:55:48PM +0530, Medhamsh wrote:
> On Wed, December 21, 2011 11:41 pm, James McCoy wrote:
> 
> > Yes, although I wonder if pyclewn is a better solution now.  Clewn
> > hasn't seen any activity in a couple years and seems to be more limited in
> > what it can do.
> 
> Shall i retitle clewn or submit an ITP for pyclewn? Please suggest.

That's up to you. :) You're the one doing the work so you get to decide
what you're going to package.  My observation was just based on a quick
glance at the clewn website.  I haven't used either project, so I don't
have a strong opinion on which one would be the most useful to package.

-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20111221/53a98314/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list