Vim runtime files
Stefano Zacchiroli
zack at debian.org
Sun Jan 15 20:39:13 UTC 2012
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 03:33:11PM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> As requested below, Bram would like the runtime files which are
> using a more restrictive license than Vim to be relicensed under the Vim
> license (which is essentially a GPL dual-license per §II.2.e).
>
> I'm contacting you because you've contributed to the debchangelog
> ftplugin for Vim while it was documented as being licensed under GPL v2
> and would like to know if you are amenable to relicensing the file under
> Vim's license?
I'm fine with re-licensing my contributions to debchangelog ftplugin
under the (current) Vim license.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o
Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20120115/e04f46b3/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers
mailing list