Bug#776191: Update licensing description in xxd.c

[James McCoy]

Hi Bram,

There was recently some discussion[0] about the licensing of xxd.  The
result of which was Jürgen clarifying[1] that it should be dual-licensed
under MIT-X11 and GPL-2 (or later).

[0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/01/msg00033.html
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/01/msg00037.html

Would you mind updating the license description in xxd.c?

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan at debian.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20150801/734d010b/attachment-0001.sig>