Conflict in vim packaging policy
jamessan at debian.org
Thu Feb 9 01:29:01 UTC 2017
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 10:57:07PM +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> I was just reading the vim packaging policy  and noticed an
> inconsistency between the specification of registry files and the
> examples at the end.
> In 3.3 "name" is mentioned as a required field, while in the examples
> there is an "addon" field instead of the "name" field.
> It looks like vim addons (and even vim-runtime.yaml) are also using
> Can you please confirm that "addon" is the field that should be used
> and correct the specification accordingly?
Indeed, the field that vim-addon-manager expects is "addon". The
confusion likely occurred because the code uses "addon" and "name"
interchangeably to access the "addon" field.
I'll update the policy.
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers