Bug#259116: FTBFS: Unable to find header file

[Mark Purcell]

--eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Killian & other pkg-voip'ers,

On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 09:04:56AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > This is fundamentally a libopenh323-dev issue as it now expects a PREFIX
> > dir, but the openh323u.mak file still appears to be mucked up as it
> > tries to rebuild /usr/lib/lib/libopenh323.so??
>=20
> actually i have (probably) just found the reason.
> This is gnugk 2.0.7-4, which is known to not compile with the pwlib 1.6
> and openh323 1.14. It's the current SARGE version and thus should be
> compiled against the SARGE version of openh323 and pwlib.
> As far as i can see, 1:2.2-0beta3-1 is available. Could you give that a
> try. Maybe 2.0.8-1 is already fixing this.=20

Hi I have the same issue with 2.0.8, which builds fine against
openh323 (1.12.2-4) in sarge, but fails against openh323 (1.13.4-3).
Have a look at:

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=3Dgnugk&ver=3D1%3A2.0.8-2&arch=3Dpo=
werpc&stamp=3D1089849890&file=3Dlog&as=3Draw

and scroll down to where it tries to build /usr/lib/lib/libopenh323.so??

This is coming from /usr/share/openh323/openh323u.mak.

Where for some reason OPENH323DIR is set as /usr/lib, previously I have
set OPENH323DIR as /usr/share/openh323 prior to calling the .mak file.

If in /usr/share/openh323/openh323u.mak I set OPENh323DIR to /usr then
it doesn't try to build /usr/lib/lib/libopenh323.so, as it verifies that
/usr/lib/libopenh323.so exists, and passes, but then my executable does
not work.

=46rom  http://www.gnugk.org

Known good combinations are as follows:
  =20
    GnuGk    OpenH323  PWLib      Other
   2.2 beta 4 1.14.0   1.7.0   OpenSSL 0.9.6j
   2.2 beta 4 1.13.5   1.6.6-1 OpenSSL 0.9.6j
   2.0.8      1.14.0   1.7.0   OpenSSL 0.9.6j
   2.0.8      1.13.5   1.6.6-1 OpenSSL 0.9.6j
   2.0.8      1.12.3   1.5.3   OpenSSL 0.9.6j
   2.0.7      1.12.1   1.5.2   OpenSSL 0.9.6b

I would of hoped that 1.13.5 would of been close enough to 1.13.4 in
sid, but maybe not.  Based on above from a gnugk perspective I would=20
prefer to move openh323 to either 1.14.0 or 1.13.5, but then it also
depends on what works with asterisk and gnomemeeting as well.

> Please let me know which one of both does build ok, so we can move 2.2
> to SID if needed.

Given that gnugk-2.2 stream are all still in beta, I am a bit hesistant
to move that into sid as it would proably make it into sarge prior to
release.  2.0.x seems to still have active development and is rock
solid, so unless upsream release 2.2 out of beta, my preference is to
have 2.0.x in testing/ unstable and the beta 2.2.x in experimental.

Mark


--eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA9kT8oCzanz0IthIRAjOYAJ9Wg5K6Md+YgXP4uHwOzUnoczmpJwCdED9j
hNtFZdhMHxIHRYNp/6rbFFk=
=/VU0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ--