Bug#249040: FTBFS: Build-dep on non-existant package libdv2-dev

Kilian Krause Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>, 249040@bugs.debian.org
Sat, 15 May 2004 00:52:56 +0200

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jeff,

> | Package: pwlib Severity: serious Tags: experimental
> |
> | pwlib in experimental fails to build because it depends on
> | libdv2-dev, which doesn't exist in experimental or unstable.
> |
> yes, but there is some in testing...
> okay, we'll include dependency on |libdv4-dev (maybe persuade the
> maintainer of libdv to try another package naming scheme).

whoopsi =3D)=20
This was sorted into the wrong folder for this thread so it seems the
answer is already there .. ;)

Tim: when writing to "Daniel Kobras <kobras@debian.org>" maybe you could
ask him to do a libdv-dev development and a libdv4 binary package.. That
should do for it's the average packaging policy (either common practice
or actually in the packaging manual, dunno which of both *g*)

Best regards,

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)