[Pkg-voip-commits] r1049 - in pwlib/trunk/debian: . patches
Kilian Krause
kilian at debian.org
Sun Dec 4 10:16:09 UTC 2005
Hi Tzafrir,
Am Sonntag, den 04.12.2005, 10:49 +0200 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 06:12:48PM +0000, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Author: kilian
> > Date: 2005-12-03 18:12:47 +0000 (Sat, 03 Dec 2005)
> > New Revision: 1049
> >
> > Added:
> > pwlib/trunk/debian/patches/11_minor_fixes.dpatch
> >
>
> As the order of patches is set in 00list anyway, is there any point in
> prefixing a number to a dpatch name?
not technically. It's just to see more clearly from the filename what's
applied when. Seeing the stacking only in 00list is somewhat more
complicated than looking at the filename only. Yet you're right and this
could have gone without the number.
--
Best regards,
Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20051204/1b9ae8da/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list