Bug#342138: package asterisk-dev should contain asterisk.h main
header
Caio Begotti
caio at ueberalles.net
Mon Dec 5 19:53:00 UTC 2005
On Monday 05 December 2005 17:36, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Specifically, I know that at least some of the packages that claim to
> require it, actually don't.
I thought that could be my case too, but I've found some problems compilling
Unicall stuff without it.
> Could you please provide one specific example of a package that needs
> asterisk.h ?
My packages for the Unicall abstraction layer does need it:
http://caio.ueberalles.net/asterisk/unicall/
More specifically the asterisk-chan-unicall package, if I remember correctly.
I mean, if it doesn't hurt, why not to include it? The chan_unicall.so
channel used to be put inside the asterisk/channels/ dir to compile properly
because the Makefile for channels just knows where to look for this header.
I think it would be even more difficult to merge Unicall code into the
Asterisk package, right? :-) for I opened this bug.
PS: maybe the "should" word might be changed to "could"...
Regards,
--
Caio Begotti (caio1982)
http://caio.ueberalles.net
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers
mailing list