Bug#294884: asterisk: Illegal Instruction on VIA CPUs
Mark Purcell
Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org>, 294884@bugs.debian.org
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:08:18 +0000
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 04:25:49PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> > PROC=3D$(system uname -m)
> >=20
> > The attached patch replaces i686 with i586. It should be applied after
> > the makefile patch.
>=20
> IMHO we should use i386, as everythng in Debian is compiled for that
> target. But I would like to see any permormance test using different
> architectures. Not sure how to do it... any ideas? Mark?
I'm pretty sure that Debian policy states that we must build with i386,
and we were checking with the asterisk build through dpkg-architecture.
This is also similar to the sparc issue we had about two months back.
I have also had all sorts of problems trying to remotly debug problems
with asterisk binary packages not running on lower arcitectures.
If the default binaries are built for lowest common denominator then
if people really want the performance ehanced then it is pretty easy for
those that want to rebuild the binaries for thier specific
implementation.
Btw, while I am back into email now I'm still only on dialup, broadband
is comining so it maybe a little while before I get my svn back into
sync with upstream. Thanks for keeping to momentum with asterisk in my
absence.
Mark
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCDlQioCzanz0IthIRAu7+AJ9j4Yc/jlGb4CBdDEfprE6rbDJXxACeP2lW
T4CHIWzXK9DV4nRmsM/Y3V0=
=d8Sy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--