Moving packages to Sid

[Mark Purcell]

Looks like a plan to me.

Things are pretty good in testing anyway, so we can move the sandbox
from experimental to unstable without too much pain.

Mark

On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:31:53PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> 
>  Hi,
> 
>  I think it is time to move stuff to Sid from experimental. There are
> though two things that don't make this 100% clear:
> 
>    1. asterisk-oh323 is still blocked in NEW queue. Anyway, we are going
> to make asterisk-h323 a fake package, disabling the code. Shipping
> broken binaries is the same than not having them
> 
>    2. zaptel maintainer has not yet replied about some issues for zaptel
> in asterisk. That would be nice to be solved too.
> 
> 
>  So, basically, the plan is as follows:
> 
>   1. Compile pwlib/openh323 mimas release. It will have the same
> "soname" that current packages. We expect that there is no API/ABI
> breakage, but we are not 100% sure. Anyway, changing the name will mean
> that packages are going to get stuck in NEW.
> 
>   2. Compile any pacakage depending on them, including asterisk with a
> disabled asterisk-h323 package. For now we are going to keep
> optimization for this package set to i586 till we consider how this
> could be resolved in a way that doesn't mean we ship a unusable package.
> Also, dependencies/recommendations on asterisk-oh323 would be activated
> only when it gets out of NEW.
> 
>   3. UPLOAD, UPLOAD, UPLOAD
> 
>   4. Pray
> 
>   If anyone has any comment, please do it.
> 
>   Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
>    jsogo@debian.org