Bug#289422: marked as done (libpt-1.4.11 depends on libavc1394)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:33:20 -0800

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:20 +0100
with message-id <1105234160.5107.6.camel@mars>
and subject line pwlib is indeed an OS abstraction layer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 00:55:51 +0000
>From return@village.in-berlin.de Sat Jan 08 16:55:51 2005
Return-path: <return@village.in-berlin.de>
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de [] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CnRN0-0006dx-00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:55:51 -0800
X-Envelope-From: return@village.in-berlin.de
X-Envelope-To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from austausch (village.in-berlin.de [])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j090tlxu031992
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT)
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:55:48 +0100
Received: from olaf by austausch with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CnQmd-0001Nf-Mx; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:18:15 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olaf Schulz <bugreports@village.in-berlin.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libpt-1.4.11 depends on libavc1394
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:18:15 +0100
Message-Id: <E1CnQmd-0001Nf-Mx@austausch>
Sender: Olaf Schulz <return@village.in-berlin.de>
X-Spam-Score: (-4.532) ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libpt-1.4.11
Version: 1.4.11-3
Severity: normal

I can't see any sensible reason why libpt-1.4.11 should depend on a package
like  libavc1394 which is used to program a specific kind of I/O interface.
Does libpt-1.4.11 borrow code from libavc1394 ?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-xfs.noinitrd.acpi.athlon
Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libpt-1.4.11 depends on:
ii  libavc1394-0                0.4.1-2      control IEEE1394 audio/video devic
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdc1394-9                 0.9.1-2      high level programming interface f
ii  libdv2                      0.99-2       A software library for DV format d
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.4.3-6    GCC support library
ii  libraw1394-5                0.10.1-1.1   library for direct access to IEEE 
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7e-2     SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.4-13   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

Received: (at 289422-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 01:29:25 +0000
>From kk@verfaction.de Sat Jan 08 17:29:25 2005
Return-path: <kk@verfaction.de>
Received: from nyx.verfaction.de (mx.verfaction.de) [] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CnRtV-0005Du-00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:29:25 -0800
Received: from mars.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::77] helo=roadwarrior.verfaction.de)
	by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1CnRtT-0000w7-1W
	for 289422-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:23 +0100
Received: from kk by roadwarrior.verfaction.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CnRtR-0003it-00
	for <289422-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:21 +0100
From: Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>
To: 289422-done@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:20 +0100
Message-Id: <1105234160.5107.6.camel@mars>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::77
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de
Subject: pwlib is indeed an OS abstraction layer
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NFh9CfZIF6glWz1i2hwX"
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200)
Delivered-To: 289422-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Olaf,

pwlib is indeed an OS abstraction layer. Thus it's plain legal to depend
on other libraries to do the I/O with devices like AVC, DC, ALSA etc.

If you have further questions, please mail me so we can discuss this.

Best regards,

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)