Bug#289422: marked as done (libpt-1.4.11 depends on libavc1394)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:33:20 -0800
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:20 +0100
with message-id <1105234160.5107.6.camel@mars>
and subject line pwlib is indeed an OS abstraction layer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 00:55:51 +0000
>From return@village.in-berlin.de Sat Jan 08 16:55:51 2005
Return-path: <return@village.in-berlin.de>
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CnRN0-0006dx-00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:55:51 -0800
X-Envelope-From: return@village.in-berlin.de
X-Envelope-To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from austausch (village.in-berlin.de [192.109.21.194])
(authenticated bits=0)
by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j090tlxu031992
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT)
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:55:48 +0100
Received: from olaf by austausch with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CnQmd-0001Nf-Mx; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:18:15 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olaf Schulz <bugreports@village.in-berlin.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libpt-1.4.11 depends on libavc1394
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:18:15 +0100
Message-Id: <E1CnQmd-0001Nf-Mx@austausch>
Sender: Olaf Schulz <return@village.in-berlin.de>
X-Spam-Score: (-4.532) ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libpt-1.4.11
Version: 1.4.11-3
Severity: normal
I can't see any sensible reason why libpt-1.4.11 should depend on a package
like libavc1394 which is used to program a specific kind of I/O interface.
Does libpt-1.4.11 borrow code from libavc1394 ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-xfs.noinitrd.acpi.athlon
Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libpt-1.4.11 depends on:
ii libavc1394-0 0.4.1-2 control IEEE1394 audio/video devic
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdc1394-9 0.9.1-2 high level programming interface f
ii libdv2 0.99-2 A software library for DV format d
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
ii libraw1394-5 0.10.1-1.1 library for direct access to IEEE
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2 SSL shared libraries
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289422-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 01:29:25 +0000
>From kk@verfaction.de Sat Jan 08 17:29:25 2005
Return-path: <kk@verfaction.de>
Received: from nyx.verfaction.de (mx.verfaction.de) [212.9.161.72] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CnRtV-0005Du-00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:29:25 -0800
Received: from mars.verfaction.de ([3ffe:400:d00:7357::77] helo=roadwarrior.verfaction.de)
by mx.verfaction.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1CnRtT-0000w7-1W
for 289422-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:23 +0100
Received: from kk by roadwarrior.verfaction.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CnRtR-0003it-00
for <289422-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:21 +0100
From: Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>
To: 289422-done@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:29:20 +0100
Message-Id: <1105234160.5107.6.camel@mars>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 3ffe:400:d00:7357::77
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de
Subject: pwlib is indeed an OS abstraction layer
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NFh9CfZIF6glWz1i2hwX"
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200)
Delivered-To: 289422-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-NFh9CfZIF6glWz1i2hwX
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Olaf,
pwlib is indeed an OS abstraction layer. Thus it's plain legal to depend
on other libraries to do the I/O with devices like AVC, DC, ALSA etc.
If you have further questions, please mail me so we can discuss this.
--=20
Best regards,
Kilian
--=-NFh9CfZIF6glWz1i2hwX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBB4Ijwvdkzt4X+wX8RAo1WAJ431niVNU29tX+sir3x8FEIDrwqrACeOrKF
gbsAdzOzKoCWH7a0DRlhMzs=
=N3Kt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-NFh9CfZIF6glWz1i2hwX--