Please consider asterisk-spandsp-plugins for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo jsogo@debian.org
Fri, 13 May 2005 20:01:13 +0200


--=-2e7QQRW3NF2JX1gMBYdo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

El vie, 13-05-2005 a las 11:12 -0400, Joey Hess escribi=C3=B3:
> Paul Cupis wrote:
> > >>I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please
> > >>consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge.
> > >=20
> > > Approved with the usual testing delay.
> >=20
> > The maintainers for this package appear to have made a subsquent upload=
.
> > Will there be any chance of this newer version getting into sarge, or
> > will we now have to live without this package?
>=20
> Well they packaged a new upstream version, which I have not reviewed,
> but which I doubt is going to get into sarge. At this point the only
> option seems to be t-p-u, but I think you need to get the maintainer on
> board and caring about getting thier package into sarge instead of
> obstructing it first.

  If t-p-u is needed, let's use t-p-u. Using t-p-u is not so hard (a bit
messy). If you think that this is the best option, a package for t-p-u
can be prepared this weekend.

--=20
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   jsogo@debian.org

--=-2e7QQRW3NF2JX1gMBYdo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBChOtpS+BYJZB4jhERAojNAJ9WalOFdUfV6igrBrHeULTtkEaEGACfT0hx
6yBo3mWjxSPO6EaU+h4sP0A=
=3qna
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-2e7QQRW3NF2JX1gMBYdo--