Bug#329084: marked as done (zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/)

Mon Nov 21 18:18:23 UTC 2005

Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:08:39 +0000
with message-id <200511211808.39710.msp at debian.org>
and subject line Bug#329084: zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 13:10:08 +0000
>From zobel at ftbfs.de Mon Sep 19 06:10:08 2005
Return-path: <zobel at ftbfs.de>
Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de [212.112.246.221] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EHLPL-000414-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:10:07 -0700
Received: from localhost (localimap [192.168.2.3])
	by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A899AC59
	for <submit at bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:08:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de ([192.168.2.3])
	by localhost (frigg.ftbfs.de [192.168.2.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 14024-06 for <submit at bugs.debian.org>;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (dialin13.stud.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.60.13])
	by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865BF9A0AF
	for <submit at bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B6E17A00088; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:09:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:09:45 +0200
From: Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel at debian.org>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/
Message-ID: <20050919130945.GD11324 at ftbfs.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-ftbfs-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frigg.ftbfs.de (config: 0.1a)
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: zaptel
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source
Version: 1:1.2.0-0beta1-1
Tags: experimental

> dh_installdocs -a
> dh_installman -a doc/ztmonitor.8.gz doc/ztcfg.8.gz doc/zttool.8.gz \
>   debian/genzaptelconf.8 debian/zttest.8 debian/ztspeed.8 \
>   debian/fxotune.8
> # should be removed, eventually. Still left for compatibility
> dh_installinit --update-rcd-params="defaults 15 30"
> dh_installexamples -a zaptel.conf.sample modexamples/*
> cp: cannot stat `modexamples/*': No such file or directory
> dh_installexamples: command returned error code 256
> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1

Full build-log can be found at
http://experimental.debian.net/fetch.php?&pkg=zaptel&ver=1%3A1.2.0-0beta1-1&arch=s390&stamp=1127094266&file=log&as=raw

Greetings
Martin

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329084-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2005 18:09:10 +0000
>From msp at debian.org Mon Nov 21 10:09:10 2005
Return-path: <msp at debian.org>
Received: from 88-109-1-15.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com
	([88.109.1.15] helo=bristol.purcell.id.au ident=Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EeG6I-0006Ft-89
	for 329084-done at bugs.debian.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:09:10 -0800
Received: from [192.168.3.149] (helo=dell.purcell.id.au)
	by bristol.purcell.id.au with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EeG67-0001Hj-4I; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:09:06 +0000
Received: from mark by dell.purcell.id.au with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EeG5n-0001ko-PR; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:08:40 +0000
From: Mark Purcell <msp at debian.org>
Organization: Debian GNU Linux
To: 329084-done at bugs.debian.org
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:08:39 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
Cc: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig at debian.org>,
 Rob Weir <rweir at ertius.org>
References: <20050919130945.GD11324 at ftbfs.de> <20051028155558.GB17985 at ooder.ertius.org> <20051103114225.GK19823 at djpig.de>
In-Reply-To: <20051103114225.GK19823 at djpig.de>
Disposition-Notification-To: Mark Purcell <msp at debian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511211808.39710.msp at debian.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.3.149
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: 329084-done at bugs.debian.org, djpig at debian.org, rweir at ertius.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: msp at debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#329084: zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bristol.purcell.id.au)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

While it might be reproducible on the experimental buildd's, it does not 
present an issue and the package has built correctly on the main s390 buildd.

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=zaptel&ver=1%3A1.2.0-1&arch=s390&stamp=1132250886&file=log&as=raw

Thus I'm closing this bug report.

Mark

On Thursday 03 November 2005 11:42, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> tags 329084 - unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 01:55:58AM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> > I can't reproduce the error in the bug log, nor the error in the buildd
> > log; perhaps this should be closed?
>
> It's perfectly reproducible on every of our buildds for experimental.
> Note that you need to build the package with -B to reproduce it, though.
> Also I could reproduce it with dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -B on my
> main system, but not in a pbuilder.
>
> Gruesse,