asterisk 1.2.0-0beta1

[Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo]

El dom, 02-10-2005 a las 03:21 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen escribió:
> Hi
> 
> I just commited to the svn initial Asterisk 1.2 debian/ dir. It
> generally seems to work, but still needs some work.

  OK, only some problems with this commit
   1. If it is targeted to experimental, it should have gone to
branches/scud, instead of trunk, to allow newer uploads to unstable

   2. You have to try to integrate as much as possible changes made in
unstable. I see a UNRELEASED 1.0.9-6 version, with a dependency in
adduser 3.64 that was reverted with your commit, and also that
{asterisk-}gtk-console package was removed from control file, which you
have enabled agagin.

   3. And be cereful with version numbers. 1:1.2.0.dfsg.1-0beta1-1 is
almost unparsable, but the most important thig is:
   
  jose at gimli:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1:1.2.0.dfsg-1 gt
1:1.2.0.dfsg.1-0beta1-1
  jose at gimli:~$ echo $?
  1

  Which means that when we want to upload released 1.2.0, we will have
to use another trick or mak epoch 2: For example, something as easy as
1:1.2.0.beta1.dfsg-1 will work (as final will be 1:1.2.0.dfsg-1 and d >
b) Anyway, dpkg --compare-versions is your friend in this situations.

  I was going to fix this a bit, but first I need to know if this
release is intended for experimental or not.
 
  Cheers,

P.S: Ah! BTW, I don't know if you have done so yet, but perhaps you
should read Debian Policy to clarify all of this.

-- 
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   jsogo at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20051002/adb49b27/attachment.pgp