asterisk 1.2.0-0beta1

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:36:58AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 02:29:54AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> > 
> > >    3. And be cereful with version numbers. 1:1.2.0.dfsg.1-0beta1-1 is
> > > almost unparsable, but the most important thig is:
> > >    
> > >   jose at gimli:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1:1.2.0.dfsg-1 gt
> > > 1:1.2.0.dfsg.1-0beta1-1
> > >   jose at gimli:~$ echo $?
> > >   1
> > > 
> > >   Which means that when we want to upload released 1.2.0, we will have
> > > to use another trick or mak epoch 2: For example, something as easy as
> > > 1:1.2.0.beta1.dfsg-1 will work (as final will be 1:1.2.0.dfsg-1 and d >
> > > b) Anyway, dpkg --compare-versions is your friend in this situations.
> > 
> > This works for Asterisk. What about libpri and zaptel? create a .dfsg
> > tarball for them as well? Without the .dfsg this fails:
> > 
> > $ dpkg --compare-versions 1:1.2.0.beta1-1 gt 1:1.2.0-1 && echo greater
> > greater
> 
> How about:
> 
> 1.1.9-0.beta1
> 
> Also note:
> 
> $ dpkg --compare-versions 1:1.1.9-0.beta2 gt 1:1.1.9-0.rc1 && echo greater
> [nothing]

OK, so I'll give it a shot. libpri seems the simpler of the packages, so
I'll start with it. I eventually used 1.1.9.0beta1-1 , which seems
simpler.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen     icq#16849755  +972-50-7952406
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com  http://www.xorcom.com