asterisk 1.2.0-0beta1

[Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo]

El dom, 09-10-2005 a las 12:59 +0100, Mark Purcell escribió:
> On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:00, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > > 1:1.2.0.beta1.dfsg-1	-> experimental
> > > 1:1.2.0.beta1.dfsg-2	-> experimental (if debian makes changes)
> > > 1:1.2.0.beta2.dfsg-1	-> experimental (if upstream makes another beta
> > > release) 1:1.2.0.rc1.dfsg-1		-> experimental (if upstream makes a RC
> > > release) 1:1.2.0.rc2.dfsg-1		-> experimental
> > > [...]
> > > 1:1.2.0.dfsg-1			-> unstable (when upstream makes final release)
> > > 1:1.2.0.dfsg-2			-> unstable (when debian makes another release)
> >
> > sorry, if I contradict, but rc* is greater than dfsg* AFAICT. Thus we
> > should not go for rc* unless we want to put release.dfsg afterwards
> > (which would be greater than rc again) IMHO. Rather we should jump from
> > beta to dfsg which is a consistent step from b->d.
> 
> Opps! Thanks for that!
> 
> You are of course correct and my mistake again.. That said I think we will 
> need to accomidate some sort of RC versioning as digum have done that in the 
> past.
> 
> Here is a reworked proposal, using - and . to get around the issues :-)

 There is another way, which can be a little unclean, but less prone to
errors: 
  1:1.1.99+1.2.0.beta.dfsg-[1,2...] -> experimental
  1:1.1.99+1.2.0.rc[1,2,...].dfsg-[1,2...] -> experimental
  1:1.2.0.dfsg-[1,2...] -> unstable

  Of course, this means that no real 1.1.99 should be made, but well, I
hope it won't be needed.

  Cheers,

-- 
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   jsogo at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20051009/a3d726dd/attachment.pgp