asterisk 1.2.0-0beta1

[Mark Purcell]

On Monday 10 October 2005 09:28, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
[...]
> So what have we gained here?

The plan is to have a documented road map, so we have agreement as to which 
version number comes next..

[...]
> So previously someone has installed packages from experimental they only
> ineeded to downgrade manually zaptel and libpri. Now they are forced to
> manually downgrade Asterisk as well.

No there is no need to manually downgrade asterisk, and with the cvs, there is 
no need to manually downgrade zaptel nor libpri..

> Not to mention the problematic version string (right?).

I think we have that sorted now.

> I think I'll go ahead with 1.1.9 for my current 1.2 tarballs, so I won't
> force more manual downgrades that I have to.

Problem is we can't upload 1.1.9 into experimental for libpri nor zaptel.

The proposed numbering scheme takes ensures we don't have to do any manual 
downgrades.  If we proceed without and agreed numbering roadmap, we proably 
will require manual downgrades..

Mark


>
> And in case I'll change my mind, I can always upgrade from them to
> 1.2.0-something :-)