asterisk dapper.2114_to_dapper.2234 diff

[Kilian Krause]

Tzafrir,

Am Sonntag, den 06.08.2006, 23:08 +0300 schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 05:53:53PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Tzafrir,
> > 
> > > You probably meant /usr/sbin, where it should have been named something
> > > of the sort of update_asterisk. But I don't like this.
> > 
> > actually update-asterisk would be good. (Just like update-grub or
> > update-modules)
> 
> update-grub is something that the user (admin) may actually need to run:
> upon editig menu.lst. But I still see no reason for running asterisk_fix
> manually.

...and it's also run by kernels upon configure of the postinst. That is
even the regular way (like dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.17-1-...) to
rebuild the initramfs and have it updated in the bootloader. To me
that's not much different from what asterisk_fix is doing (adding some
more generic post-install-hook that *may* be called by the user after
screwing up - or by a regular maintainer script)

> If you think it there is a point of putting it in /usr/sbin, please
> formulate a man page describing the functionality of that program to the
> user.

"Updates the permissions of the asterisk configuration files. Used by
the asterisk package itself and all kind of helper apps that come as an
extension or addon to asterisk. Usually shouldn't be required to be run
manually."

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20060807/8e09706d/attachment.pgp